Re: git 2.10.1 test regression in t4014-format-patch.sh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On October 9, 2016 5:15:22 PM PDT, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jeremyhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Hey Josh,
>
>Hope you're doing well.
>
>I wanted to let you know that this patch of yours, which landed in git
>2.10.1, introduced some test failures, seen on macOS.
>
>Let me know if you need any additional information to track these down.
>
>Thanks,
>Jeremy
>
>
>not ok 65 - format-patch default signature
>#	
>#		git format-patch --stdout -1 | tail -n 3 >output &&
>#		signature >expect &&
>#		test_cmp expect output
>#	
>
>not ok 132 - format-patch --base
>#	
>#		git checkout side &&
>#		git format-patch --stdout --base=HEAD~3 -1 | tail -n 7 >actual &&
>#		echo >expected &&
>#		echo "base-commit: $(git rev-parse HEAD~3)" >>expected &&
>#		echo "prerequisite-patch-id: $(git show --patch HEAD~2 | git
>patch-id --stable | awk "{print \$1}")" >>expected &&
>#		echo "prerequisite-patch-id: $(git show --patch HEAD~1 | git
>patch-id --stable | awk "{print \$1}")" >>expected &&
>#		signature >> expected &&
>#		test_cmp expected actual
>#	

Can you run the test with the option to show the expected and actual strings?

Did the testsuite run with the wrong git somehow?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]