Jakub Narębski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > W dniu 05.10.2016 o 16:46, sorganov@xxxxxxxxx pisze: >> From: Sergey Organov <sorganov@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Old description had a few problems: >> >> - sounded as if commits have changes >> >> - stated that changes are taken since some "divergence point" >> that was not defined. >> >> New description rather uses "common ancestor" and "merge base", >> definitions of which are easily discoverable in the rest of GIT >> documentation. > > This is a step in a good direction, but it has a few issues. Thanks a lot for reviewing! I'll need time to read your reply carefully. -- Sergey