Re: [PATCH 1/6] git-merge: clarify "usage" by adding "-m <msg>"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



sorganov@xxxxxxxxx writes:

> From: Sergey Organov <sorganov@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> "-m <msg>" is one of essential distinctions between obsolete
> invocation form and the recent one. Add it to the "usage" returned by
> 'git merge -h' for more clarity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  builtin/merge.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/merge.c b/builtin/merge.c
> index a8b57c7..0e367ba 100644
> --- a/builtin/merge.c
> +++ b/builtin/merge.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ struct strategy {
>  };
>  
>  static const char * const builtin_merge_usage[] = {
> -	N_("git merge [<options>] [<commit>...]"),
> +	N_("git merge [<options>] [-m <msg>] [<commit>...]"),
>  	N_("git merge [<options>] <msg> HEAD <commit>"),
>  	N_("git merge --abort"),
>  	NULL

While this is not wrong per-se, as the deprecated form will go away
soon, I hope you do not mind if I had to drop this one from the
series to avoid merge conflicts to 'pu' (I do not know how bad the
conflict would be yet; I am just reviewing in my MUA).




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]