Re: [PATCH] http: http.emptyauth should allow empty (not just NULL) usernames

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:54:19PM +0000, David Turner wrote:

> > I dunno. The code path you are changing _only_ affects anything if the
> > http.emptyauth config is set. But I guess I just don't understand why you
> > would say "http://@gitserver"; in the first place. Is that a common thing?
> 
> I have no idea if it is common.  I know that we do it.

I guess my question is: _why_ do you do it? Or more specifically, does
http://gitserver.example.com"; with http.emptyauth not work, and why?

>From your response, I _think_ the answer is "no, it doesn't, and I have
no clue why".

So I dunno. It is annoying not to know what is actually going on, but
I'm OK with it if we don't think there's a high chance of regressing any
other workflows (which I guess not, because http.emptyauth seems to be a
Kerberos-specific hack in the first place).

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]