Re: [PATCH 1/5] pretty: allow formatting DATE_SHORT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:33 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > There's no way to do this short of "%ad" and --date=short,
> > but that limits you to having a single date format in the
> > output.
> >
> > This would possibly be better done with something more like
> > "%ad(short)".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  pretty.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/pretty.c b/pretty.c
> > index 493edb0..c532c17 100644
> > --- a/pretty.c
> > +++ b/pretty.c
> > @@ -727,6 +727,9 @@ static size_t format_person_part(struct strbuf *sb, char part,
> >         case 'I':       /* date, ISO 8601 strict */
> >                 strbuf_addstr(sb, show_ident_date(&s, DATE_MODE(ISO8601_STRICT)));
> >                 return placeholder_len;
> > +       case 's':
> > +               strbuf_addstr(sb, show_ident_date(&s, DATE_MODE(SHORT)));
> > +               return placeholder_len;
> >         }
> >
> >  skip:
> > --
> > 2.10.0.566.g5365f87
> >
> 
> Nice. I use date=short in some of my aliases and switching to this is
> nicer. I assume this turns into "%(as)"?
> 
> What about documenting this in  pretty-formats.txt?

Here you go :)

  http://public-inbox.org/git/1444235305-8718-1-git-send-email-szeder@xxxxxxxxxx/




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]