On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 04:00:06AM -0700, Kyle J. McKay wrote: > > Each of those commits[1] needs some minor polish, and as I'm not really > > that interested in fancy log output myself, I don't plan on working on > > them further. I was mostly curious just how close we were. But if you'd > > like to pursue it, feel free to use them as a starting point. > > Those patches are missing some of the features like showing root commits, > handling two letter initials, showing the weekday, inserting a break where > needed to avoid parent-child confusion in graph output and properly handling > Duy's initials. :) I'm not too surprised. I literally looked at the first screenshot from your output and thought "surely git can do that with some minor tweaks". Nor am I surprised that there are cases where the output is funny (99% of the time I spent on it was tracking down that graph-padding bug). I have no problem taking this in contrib or whatever, until a point when Git is capable of doing the same thing itself. I just hoped to trick you into working on Git. :) -Peff