Re: git 2.9.2: is RUNTIME_PREFIX supposed to work?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: git 2.9.2: is RUNTIME_PREFIX supposed to work?
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:57:29 -0700
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1474925524.4270.35.camel@mad-scientist.net>
References: <1474925524.4270.35.camel@mad-scientist.net>

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all.  I'm trying to create a relocatable installation of Git 2.9.2,
> so I can copy it anywhere and it continues to run without any problem.
> This is on GNU/Linux systems, FWIW.

I had an impression that the setting was only to support MS Windows.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: git 2.9.2: is RUNTIME_PREFIX supposed to work?
  - From: Paul Smith

References:
- git 2.9.2: is RUNTIME_PREFIX supposed to work?
  - From: Paul Smith

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v4] revision: new rev^-n shorthand for rev^n..rev
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v4] revision: new rev^-n shorthand for rev^n..rev
Previous by thread: git 2.9.2: is RUNTIME_PREFIX supposed to work?
Next by thread: Re: git 2.9.2: is RUNTIME_PREFIX supposed to work?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]