Re: [RFC PATCH] revision: new rev%n shorthand for rev^n..rev

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I use rev^..rev daily, and I'm surely not the only one. To save typing
> (or copy-pasting, if the rev is long -- like a full SHA-1 or branch name)
> we can make rev% a shorthand for that.

No, we cannot.

'%' is not reserved as a special character that is forbidden in
reference names, and for somebody who has a branch whose name is
'master%', such a change will suddenly make 'master%' mean something
completely different, breaking existing users' repositories.

This is why existing rev^@ and rev^! both use the "^" as the first
character that introduces the "magic" semantics; "^" cannot be a
part of a refname.  Also sequences that begin with "^{" and "@{" are
reserved as escape hatches to allow us extend the revision syntax in
the future ("^{" works on history, while "@{" bases its working on
the reflog data).

As "rev^$n" is "nth parent", it may be a possibility to use "rev^-$n"
as a short-hand for "^rev^$n rev".



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]