santiago@xxxxxxx writes:
> @@ -425,8 +431,11 @@ int cmd_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> die(_("--merged and --no-merged option are only allowed with -l"));
> if (cmdmode == 'd')
> return for_each_tag_name(argv, delete_tag);
> - if (cmdmode == 'v')
> + if (cmdmode == 'v') {
> + if (fmt_pretty)
> + verify_ref_format(fmt_pretty);
> return for_each_tag_name(argv, verify_tag);
> + }
OK, you said something about for_each_ref() in an earlier commit,
but what you meant was this one, which takes each_tag_name_fn.
The function for_each_tag_name(), the type each_tag_name_fn, and the
function of that type verify_tag(), are ALL file-scope static in
this single file, builtin/tag.c. It seems to me that it is not
necessary to make the format string global at all.
> @@ -425,8 +431,11 @@ int cmd_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> die(_("--merged and --no-merged option are only allowed with -l"));
> if (cmdmode == 'd')
> return for_each_tag_name(argv, delete_tag);
> - if (cmdmode == 'v')
> + if (cmdmode == 'v') {
> + if (fmt_pretty)
> + verify_ref_format(fmt_pretty);
> return for_each_tag_name(argv, verify_tag);
> + }
There are minor implementation and design issues I spotted, but
overall I think the feature the series attempts to add may be a good
thing to have.
Thanks.