On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 07:45:50PM +0200, Kevin Daudt wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:36:57AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Kevin Daudt <me@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:30:34PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > >> > > >> * kd/mailinfo-quoted-string (2016-09-19) 2 commits > > >> - mailinfo: unescape quoted-pair in header fields > > >> - t5100-mailinfo: replace common path prefix with variable > > > > > > Is this good enough, or do you want me to look into the feedback from > > > jeff? > > > > If you are talking about the simplified loop that deliberately sets > > a rule that is looser than RFC, yes, I'd like to see you at least > > consider the pros and cons of his approach, which looked nicer to my > > brief reading of it. > > > > It is perfectly OK by me (it may not be so if you ask Peff) if you > > decide that your version is better after doing so, though. > > Alright, I'll look into it. Thanks. I am OK if we do not use my simplified version, but I think there were some issues I noted with your last version. -Peff