Re: clarification of `rev-list --no-walk ^<rev>`?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@xxxxxxx> writes:

>> The "--no-walk" tells the rev-list machinery "I have only positives;
>> do not traverse from them AT ALL but just use these positives".
>> Only under that condition, the order of the positive ends you list
>> on the command line matters.
>
> What does "--do-walk" do ("Overrides a previous --no-walk"), and when
> would it be applied?

Wouldn't 

    $ git cherry-pick --no-walk --do-walk A

end up walking the history behind A and reproducing the history
since the root commit?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]