Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Better heuristics make prettier diffs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 09/08/2016 01:25 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>>>   * Add test t4059 as part of this commit, not as part of its
>>>     successor.
>> 
>> Which needs to be moved to somewhere else, as another topics that
>> has already been in 'next' uses t4059.
>> 
>> I'd move it temporarily to t4061 with a separate SQUASH??? at the
>> tip for now, as I am running out of time today.
>
> I didn't realize you were waiting for an ACK. Yes, it's totally OK to
> rename the test.

I actually wasn't asking for an Ack.

As the issue was in the one that is buried a few commits from the
tip, and there is a later one that adds more tests to it, I didn't
find enough energy to rename the new file in a buried commit and
then adjust the patch later updates it, I was hoping that you'd
reroll to save me effort, rather than forcing me to do the rebase
myself ;-).




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]