On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 02:08:58PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > if (for_each_remote_ref_submodule(path, has_remote, NULL) > 0) {
> > struct child_process cp = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> > - const char *argv[] = {"rev-list", NULL, "--not", "--remotes", "-n", "1" , NULL};
> > +
> > + argv_array_push(&cp.args, "rev-list");
> > + sha1_array_for_each_unique(hashes, append_hash_to_argv, &cp.args);
> > + argv_array_pushl(&cp.args, "--not", "--remotes", "-n", "1" , NULL);
> > +
> > struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> > int needs_pushing = 0;
>
> These two become decl-after-stmt; move your new lines a bit lower,
> perhaps?
Thanks, missed those. Will do.
> > - argv[1] = sha1_to_hex(sha1);
> > - cp.argv = argv;
> > prepare_submodule_repo_env(&cp.env_array);
>
> By the way, with the two new patches, 'pu' seems to start failing
> some tests, e.g. 5533 5404 5405.
Ah ok I did only test on master, will look into those.
Cheers Heiko