On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > We have a series of 3 CRLF tests that do exactly the same > (long) setup sequence. Let's pull it out into a common setup > test, which is shorter, more efficient, and will make it > easier to add new tests. > > Note that we don't have to worry about cleaning up any of > the setup which was previously per-test; we call pop_repo > after the CRLF tests, which cleans up everything. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> This makes sense and looks good, Thanks, Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>