Re: Possible bug in --short option of git-rev-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/21/07, Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Short is abbrev + verify.  This is not new.


In my implementation I pass command line arguments first to
git-rev-parse, and the output of git-rev-parse is then used to feed
git-rev-list, that starts loading of revisions.

The problem I found is that output of git-rev-parse could be veeery
long, as example in git tree:

$ git rev-parse --all | wc
   144     144    5904

When running qgit --all on a repo with hundreds of tags this could
lead to very long command line arguments for git-rev-list so to break
platform limits. One idea to *hide* this problem was to get only the
short version of a sha so to go from 40 to 7 chars and reduce command
line size of about 6 times.

Of course the *real* solution would be to pass qgit command line
arguments directly to git-rev-list and skip git-rev-parse altogether.

My question is: In case I skip git-rev-parse and feed directly
git-rev-list with command line arguments, there is some compatibility
break in current behaviour? In other words there are some command line
arguments 'args' for whom

                             git-rev-list args != git rev-parse args
| git rev-list


Thanks
Marco
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]