Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] patch-id for merges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:18:33AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > +static int patch_id_defined(struct commit *commit)
>> > +{
>> > +	/* must be 0 or 1 parents */
>> > +	return !commit->parents || !commit->parents->next;
>> > +}
>> 
>> If we make the first hunk begin like so:
>> 
>> > +	if (commit->parents) {
>> > +		if (!patch_id_defined(commit))
>> > +			return -1;
>> 
>> I wonder if the compiler gives us the same code.
>
> Good idea. I actually put the "patch_id_defined" check outside the "if"
> block you've quoted (otherwise we're making assumptions about the
> contents of patch_id_defined).

Facepalm.  I was mis-reading the condition in the helper function.
Of course, guarding up-front makes more sense.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]