Re: [PATCH v2 21/25] sequencer: refactor write_message()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 11.09.2016 um 12:55 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
-static int write_message(struct strbuf *msgbuf, const char *filename)
+static int write_with_lock_file(const char *filename,
+				const void *buf, size_t len, int append_eol)
 {
 	static struct lock_file msg_file;

 	int msg_fd = hold_lock_file_for_update(&msg_file, filename, 0);
 	if (msg_fd < 0)
 		return error_errno(_("Could not lock '%s'"), filename);
-	if (write_in_full(msg_fd, msgbuf->buf, msgbuf->len) < 0)
-		return error_errno(_("Could not write to %s"), filename);
-	strbuf_release(msgbuf);
+	if (write_in_full(msg_fd, buf, len) < 0)
+		return error_errno(_("Could not write to '%s'"), filename);
+	if (append_eol && write(msg_fd, "\n", 1) < 0)
+		return error_errno(_("Could not write eol to '%s"), filename);
 	if (commit_lock_file(&msg_file) < 0)
 		return error(_("Error wrapping up %s."), filename);

 	return 0;
 }

The two error paths in the added lines should both

		rollback_lock_file(&msg_file);

, I think. But I do notice that this is not exactly new, so...

-- Hannes




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]