Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> Interactive rebase's scripts may be indented; we need to handle this
> case, too, now that we prepare the sequencer to process interactive
> rebases.
Hmph, have we ever given the sequencer instructions indented to the
user to edit? I do not offhand see why we want to be lenient here,
especially only to the left.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
> ---
> sequencer.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index 7953a05..5e5d113 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -875,6 +875,9 @@ static int parse_insn_line(struct todo_item *item, const char *bol, char *eol)
> char *end_of_object_name;
> int i, saved, status, padding;
>
> + /* left-trim */
> + bol += strspn(bol, " \t");
> +
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(todo_command_strings); i++)
> if (skip_prefix(bol, todo_command_strings[i], &bol)) {
> item->command = i;