Other than the duplicated sign-offs, this series looks good to me
("Don't act surprised, you guys, cuz I wrote 'em").
Kind of a funny place to cut it off, but I guess it makes sense.
On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 18:08 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> From: David Turner <dturner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Alternate refs backends might still use files to store per-worktree
> refs. So provide a way to iterate over only the per-worktree references
> in a ref_store. The other backend can set up a files ref_store and
> iterate using the new DO_FOR_EACH_PER_WORKTREE_ONLY flag when iterating.