Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Use the newly-introduced regexec_buf() function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 04:10:24AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:54:51AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > >  diff.c             |  3 ++-
> > >  diffcore-pickaxe.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> > >  xdiff-interface.c  | 13 ++++---------
> > >  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > 
> > I just realized that this should switch the test_expect_failure from 1/3
> > to a test_expect_success.
> 
> Yep. I wonder if we also would want to test that we correctly find
> regexes inside binary files.
> 
> E.g., given a mixed binary/text file like:
> 
>   printf 'binary\0text' >file &&
>   git add file &&
>   git commit -m file
> 
> then "git log -Stext" will find that file, but "--pickaxe-regex" will
> not (using stock git). Ditto for "-Gtext".
> 
> Your patch should fix that.

Of course if I had actually _looked carefully_ at your patch, I would
have seen that your test doesn't just check that we don't segfault, but
actually confirms that we find the entry.

Sorry for the noise.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]