Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] connect: advertized capability is not a ref

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Given that there aren't any servers that are going to produce this
> kind of bad input anyway, I prefer a die().

That would certainly put bigger pressure on the folks who write
buggy stuff in the future.  If we know that nobody produces such
output, I'd prefer to forbid it, of course.  It's just that is not
what this 2/2 implements ;-).




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]