Re: git clone problem through HTTP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Brian Gernhardt wrote:


On Apr 20, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Aubrey Li wrote:

On 4/20/07, Julian Phillips <julian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Aubrey Li wrote:
> > > I'm behind of a firewall on which the git port is not permitted, so I
> >  can only use http protocol. Unfortunately, I can't clone linus' git
> >  tree at all.
> > Linus packs his refs, which means that currently you can't clone using
> http, with any version of git.

I really don't understand why packed refs or not depend on the protocol.
It doesn't make any sense.

I think it's simply because git-http-fetch doesn't look for the packed-refs file.

Yep.

Are we actually going to support HTTP fetching? If so, we should update it to pull the packed-refs file too. If not, it should be clearly marked as depreciated. That said, I think HTTP is the easiest way for most people to publish and removing it would be a mistake. I'd poke at it, but there's not enough spare time in the day at the moment.

I was hoping to find time to poke this over the weekend ... maybe even this evening.

--
Julian

 ---
Nature always sides with the hidden flaw.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]