Re: [PATCH] gpg-interface: reflect stderr to stderr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Michael,

On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> 
> > A full blown approach would use --status-fd=4 or such rather than hijacking stderr.
> > This would require an extension of pipe_command() etc. to handle yet another fd.

For the record: I do not know whether that would work, either. So unless
we are fairly certain that it *would* work, I'd rather not spend the time.

Your original issue seemed to be that the gpg command could succeed, but
still no signature be seen. There *must* be a way to test whether the
called program added a signature, simply by testing whether *any*
characters were written.

And if characters were written that were not actually a GPG signature,
maybe the enterprisey user who configured the gpg command to be her magic
script actually meant something else than a GPG signature to be added?

Ciao,
Dscho



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]