Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix a segfault caused by regexec() being called on mmap()ed data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> This patch series addresses a problem where `git diff` is called using
> `-G` or `-S --pickaxe-regex` on new-born files that are configured
> without user diff drivers, and that hence get mmap()ed into memory.

Good spotting.  This has been with us almost forever; I do not think
the original pickaxe had it, but I am sure it is broken after the
"--pickaxe-regex" enhancement.

I am somehow surprised that this is a problem on Windows, though.
Wouldn't we be at least running CRLF conversions, and causing diff
or grep machinery to work on a NUL-terminated buffer?  The convesion
code would have to look at mmap'ed memory but I do not think it
assumes NUL-termination.  Perhaps people on Windows do not usually
use straight-through and that is why this was discovered after many
years, or something?  In any case, that is a digression.

> Windows (the bug does not trigger a segmentation fault for me on Linux,
> strangely enough, but it is really a problem on Windows).

I think it is an issue on all platforms that lets us use mmap().
When the size of a file is multiple of pagesize, the byte past the
end of the file can very well fall on an unmapped address.

> So at least I have a workaround in place. Ideally, though, we would
> NUL-terminate the buffers only when needed, or somehow call regexec() on
> ptr/size parameters instead of passing a supposedly NUL-terminated
> string to it?

I see two reasonable approaches.

 * We may want to revisit the performance numbers to see if using
   mmap() to read from the working tree files still buys us much.
   If not, we should stop borrowing from the working tree using
   mmap(); instead just slurp in and NUL-terminate it.

 * We could use <ptr,len> variant of regexp engine as you proposed,
   which I think is a preferrable solution.  Do people know of a
   widely accepted implementation that we can throw into compat/ as
   fallback that is compatible with GPLv2?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]