CC-ed to Jiang Xin, L10N coordinator.
W dniu 29.08.2016 o 10:05, Johannes Schindelin pisze:
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
> ---
> sequencer.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index cbdce6d..1b65202 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -232,11 +232,8 @@ static int error_dirty_index(struct replay_opts *opts)
> if (read_cache_unmerged())
> return error_resolve_conflict(action_name(opts));
>
> - /* Different translation strings for cherry-pick and revert */
> - if (opts->action == REPLAY_PICK)
> - error(_("Your local changes would be overwritten by cherry-pick."));
> - else
> - error(_("Your local changes would be overwritten by revert."));
> + error(_("Your local changes would be overwritten by %s."),
> + action_name(opts));
If I understand it correctly, it would make "revert" or "cherry-pick"
untranslated part of error message. You would need to use translation
on the result with "_(action_name(opts))", you would have to mark
todo_command_strings elements for gettext lexicon with N_(...).
I am rather against this change (see also below).
>From the first glance I though that there would be no problem with
translation legos / jigsaw it introduces, namely that the "revert"
and "cherry-pick" would require different rest of text:
po/bg.po:msgid "Your local changes would be overwritten by cherry-pick."
po/bg.po-msgstr "Локалните ви промени ще бъдат презаписани при отбирането на подавания."
--
po/bg.po:msgid "Your local changes would be overwritten by revert."
po/bg.po-msgstr "Локалните ви промени ще бъдат презаписани при отмяната на подавания."
po/de.po:msgid "Your local changes would be overwritten by cherry-pick."
po/de.po-msgstr "Ihre lokalen Änderungen würden durch den Cherry-Pick überschrieben werden."
--
po/de.po:msgid "Your local changes would be overwritten by revert."
po/de.po-msgstr "Ihre lokalen Änderungen würden durch den Revert überschrieben werden."
But it turns out that "revert" and "cherry-pick" can be of different
gender:
po/ca.po:msgid "Your local changes would be overwritten by cherry-pick."
po/ca.po-msgstr "Els vostres canvis locals se sobreescriurien pel recull de cireres."
--
po/ca.po:msgid "Your local changes would be overwritten by revert."
po/ca.po-msgstr "Els vostres canvis locals se sobreescriurien per la reversió."
In some cases "revert" and "cherry-pick" are not translated literally
(but compare translation for similar language: po/bg.po, without this):
po/ru.po:msgid "Your local changes would be overwritten by cherry-pick."
po/ru.po-msgstr "Ваши локальные изменение будут перезаписаны отбором лучшего."
--
po/ru.po:msgid "Your local changes would be overwritten by revert."
po/ru.po-msgstr "Ваши локальные изменение будут перезаписаны возвратом коммита."
Similar for (but here one side uses untranslated English term...):
po/vi.po:msgid "Your local changes would be overwritten by cherry-pick."
po/vi.po-msgstr "Các thay đổi nội bộ của bạn có thể bị ghi đè bởi lệnh cherry-pick."
--
po/vi.po:msgid "Your local changes would be overwritten by revert."
po/vi.po-msgstr "Các thay đổi nội bộ của bạn có thể bị ghi đè bởi lệnh hoàn nguyên."
For some I don't know which is the case:
po/zh_CN.po:msgid "Your local changes would be overwritten by cherry-pick."
po/zh_CN.po-msgstr "您的本地修改将被拣选操作覆盖。"
--
po/zh_CN.po:msgid "Your local changes would be overwritten by revert."
po/zh_CN.po-msgstr "您的本地修改将被还原操作覆盖。"
Unless we want to require to use English terms:
po/sv.po:msgid "Your local changes would be overwritten by cherry-pick."
po/sv.po-msgstr "Dina lokala ändringar skulle skrivas över av \"cherry-pick\"."
--
po/sv.po:msgid "Your local changes would be overwritten by revert."
po/sv.po-msgstr "Dina lokala ändringar skulle skrivas över av \"revert\"."
>
> if (advice_commit_before_merge)
> advise(_("Commit your changes or stash them to proceed."));
>