Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> writes:
> I agree that by now, the situation is too confusing and while I'm not
> happy with everything in Git, I believe that by now the best way is to
> just fix Git. Therefore, I'm announcing that I don't plan to add any (at
> least any significant) new features to Cogito. Sorry to all the Cogito
> users, it is a hard decision for me, but by now I believe that it is
> much more effective to just focus on Git.
I applaud this; I know this must have been a hard decision for
you to make.
> About git homepage:
>
> The very least I wanted to do at any rate with git.or.cz ASAP is to
> switch the crash courses to git-oriented ones too. I think git more or
> less got to a reasonable point when this is a sane idea.
I would agree, at this point.
When git.or.cz started offering those introductory pages, the
Porcelain-ish scripts (that is correct, "scripts", as there were
no "built-in" -- even "git diff" unified driver was a shell
script to driver diff-index, diff-files and diff-tree) shipped
with the core git was infinitely less pleasant to normal people,
especially the ones who have not seen the early days of git core
which shipped with almost none. When you and I talked about
what text to put on git.or.cz, it was an obvious and easy thing
to agree on that newbie documentation should be based on Cogito,
and you did all the work to put the site together.
I am saying this now for new people on the list, as I heard
an incorrect "theory" that you have been advertising Cogito
on git.or.cz site against the community's best interest,
even when nobody seems to talk about it these days on the
list anymore.
Since the early days of my involvement in git project, I said my
goal was to keep the plumbing stable, enhance the plumbing in
such a way that any and all Porcelains can do what they want
without resorting to Porcelain-specific hacks, so that the
resulting repositories can interoperate no matter what Porcelain
was used on top of the plumbing. I worded that goal as "make
the choice of Porcelains irrelevant". While that ideal still
stands, we ended up having rich enough Porcelain in the core
distribution. To some people, this might look as if we are
making alternative Porcelains irrelevant instead, but that is
not the case. Many features and workflows that are now
supported by the core Porcelain were first invented outside
(e.g. "automated tag following while fetching" came from
Cogito), and the core Porcelain does not ship with special
purpose features and expect alternative/augmentative Porcelains
to fill the niche (an existing example is that people who want
patch management use StGIT or guilt). I am reasonably sure that
there still are features and workflows that Cogito supports
better, and given time and motivated users and contributors,
hopefully they will be ported to the core Porcelain.
I would thank you for your effort to ease adoption of git family
of tools to new people with Cogito; I would ask the list to do
the same.
And I look forward to see your continued involvement to make git
better.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html