Re: GIT vs Other: Need argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:42:39PM +0200, Marcin Kasperski wrote:
> > > I agree that git introduces plenty of excellent concepts. What it needs
> > > is better docs (also, clearly known **SINGLE** master doc, just sth like
> > > subversion book),
> > 
> > Does that mean you are volunteering?
> 
> No, as I do not have necessary knowledge. But I can volunteer to review
> one.

That would be great--see Documentation/user-manual.txt.  (Or
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html.)

Patches welcomed, but so is general review.  It's not my highest
priority, unfortunately, so I may be a little slow to address comments,
but I'll get to them eventually.

I don't expect it to ever be a *single* master doc--I still want to
leave a lot of the details to the man pages, for example, and I expect
there'll always be a need for some shortcut howto's and tutorials.   I
suppose we could include much of that into appendices some day if it
helped findability.

--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]