W dniu 12.08.2016 o 09:07, Philip Oakley pisze: [...] > History traversing commands such as `git log` operate on a set > -of commits, not just a single commit. To these commands, > -specifying a single revision with the notation described in the > -previous section means the set of commits reachable from that > -commit, following the commit ancestry chain. > +of commits, not just a single commit. > + > +For these commands, > +specifying a single revision, using the notation described in the > +previous section, means the set of commits `reachable` from the given > +commit. Why such strange formatting? Is it to keep original contents for better blame / word diff? > + > +A commit's reachable set is the commit itself and the commits in > +its ancestry chain. > + It is all right, but perhaps it would be better to just repeat: +Set of commits reachable from given commit is the commit itself +and all the commits in its ancestry chain. -- Jakub Narębski -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html