Re: [RFC] Proposed questions for "Git User's Survey 2016"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



W dniu 28.08.2016 o 11:49, Eric Wong pisze:
> Jakub Narębski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> W dniu 26.08.2016 o 08:15, Eric Wong pisze:
>>
>>> Not directly-related to the survey questions, but can you ensure
>>> it's accessible to folks without JavaScript/graphics, and
>>> perhaps also ensure it is on a host that is Tor-friendly?
[..]
>> A question: would it be better to have the whole survey one one
>> large page, or have it split into pages (with fever questions
>> per page)?
> 
> I prefer single. One could get one page, take take time and let the
> connection drop/fail, and send it over all in one go.  With multiple
> pages, one would have to reconnect for every POST.

All right, I can make Git User's Survey 2016 to be on one page
(at least the anonymous JavaScript-less channel).  It turns out
that there would be 40-42 questions in this year survey.


Though I don't know how resilent Survs.com is for submitting survey
results after connection drop/fail.

*Editing* survey (which requires to be logged in, which is not needed
for submitting survey), times out after inactivity.

-- 
Jakub Narębski

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]