On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Beat Bolli <dev+git@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> @@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ archive, summarize the relevant points of the discussion.
>> If you want to reference a previous commit in the history of a stable
>> branch use the format "abbreviated sha1 (subject, date)". So for example
>> like this: "Commit f86a374 (pack-bitmap.c: fix a memleak, 2015-03-30)
>> -noticed [...]".
>> +noticed [...]". The "Copy commit summary" command of gitk generates this
>> +format.
>
> (continuing from my 1/2 review) And if people agree that the format
> gitk already uses is better, this text should probably read more
> like:
>
> If you want to reference a previous commit in the history of a
> stable branch, use the format "abbreviated sha1 (subject, date)",
> with the subject enclosed in a pair of double-quotes, like this:
>
> Commit f86a374 ("pack-bitmap.c: fix a memleak", 2015-03-30)
> noticed that ...
>
> The "Copy commit summary" command of gitk can be used to obtain this
> format.
Tangent, but I was wondering if this would make a good built-in
format, but then I looked and realized that the built-in formats
didn't make much sense to me... I'm not sure where the actual format
gets displayed so I am wondering if we had any thoughts about adding
some --pretty=summary that we could add? I know it can be implemented
via a user defined format but thought it might be worth building it in
since it's a pretty common use case?
Thanks,
Jake
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html