W dniu 13.08.2016 o 01:45, Philip Oakley pisze:
> --- a/Documentation/revisions.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/revisions.txt
> @@ -284,6 +284,10 @@ The 'r1{caret}@' notation means all parents of 'r1'.
> The 'r1{caret}!' notation includes commit 'r1' but excludes all of its parents.
> By itself, this notation denotes the single commit 'r1'.
>
> +While '<rev>{caret}<n>' was about specifying a single commit parent, these
> +two notations consider all its parents. For example you can say
> +'HEAD{caret}2{caret}@', however you cannot say 'HEAD{caret}@{caret}2'.
> +
That's good to have.
Though I do wonder if it is implementation limitation, or if it is something
inherent in the notation, namely that <rev>^@ and <rev>^! resolve (the former
at least in general, though not for every <rev>) to more than one revision
specifier.
Anyway, good addition!
--
Jakub Narębski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html