On 25 August 2016 at 07:56, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm thinking more on the lines of `%(upstream)` being an atom and the > `:track` being an option under that atom. I like sub-atom though ;) > On second thought maybe "quark" is better :P > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Ah, right. I was feeling like this was all vaguely familiar. I think >> it would be better to push forward kn/ref-filter-branch-list. >> According to the last "what's cooking", I think that topic is waiting >> on more review. If you're willing and able to do so, that would be a >> big help. >> > > It's been waiting for review for a _long_ time now. > To be perfectly honest my C skills and familiarity with the git source code is not much to speak of. I very much want to take a close look but I cannot promise anything worth your time... But if I do find something I'd like to point out should I just reply directly to the e-mails containing the patches as one usually does even though they're months old at this point? Øsse -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html