Re: git-format-patch for binary files / merges [Re: Expose subprojects as special files to "git diff" machinery]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> As to merges, they are certainly something that *can* be represented as a 
> patch [...]

> However, representing merges as a patch doesn't really make much sense.

Not if you want to apply it. But if you want to review it. That's why we 
have the combined diff format, which can be generated by diff, but not 
applied.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]