Re: [PATCH v8 7/8] cache: add empty_tree_oid object

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Is there a reason for that? I've found that .field = value is safer
>>> because it ensures that you don't end up initializing the wrong
>>> values? Or is it a compatibility thing?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> That was a bit too terse.  The answers to all three questions are
> "Yes", "Yes", and "Yes".
>
> Together with enum ... = { A, B, C, }; we may want to consider not
> worrying about ancient compilers at some point, and it might be this
> year or next year, but I do not think we want to do that as part of
> this series.

Thanks, it makes sense. It is hard to remember when some feature got added.

Regards,
Jake
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]