Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> submodule. I think we already have the complete path. Or is the name
> *not* equivalent to the path?
A submodule that is bound to top-level at "path" originally gets
"path" as its name. If you move it elsewhere, you do not want it to
lose its identity (and its place in .git/modules/* of the
top-level). so a submodule whose name is "path" can reside in the
new place after such a move.
> There was no empty line in the place I copied from.
Is that "because I copied from a source that is mistaken, I refuse
to make it right"? Or just an explanation why there is a mistake?
Or something else (like "we should update the original one while we
are at it as a pure clean-up")?
> If we put them in test_expect_success setup they aren't.
Yes, that is why I said they are unnecessary. Let's minimize the
amount of random code that sits outside the control of the test
framework (i.e. test_expect_{success,failure}).
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html