On 2016-08-12 03:07 AM, Philip Oakley wrote:
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@xxxxxxx>
---
new
Junio's final comment https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqwpkq6b4d.fsf%40gitster.mtv.corp.google.com/
---
Documentation/revisions.txt | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/revisions.txt b/Documentation/revisions.txt
index 0b5044d..934d071 100644
--- a/Documentation/revisions.txt
+++ b/Documentation/revisions.txt
@@ -284,6 +284,10 @@ The 'r1{caret}@' notation means all parents of 'r1'.
'r1{caret}!' notation includes commit 'r1' but excludes all of its parents.
This is the single commit 'r1', if standalone.
+While '<rev>{caret}<n>' was about specifying a single commit parent, these
+two notations consider all its parents. For example you can say
+'HEAD{caret}2^@', however you cannot say 'HEAD{caret}@{caret}2'.
That ^ should be {caret}, right?
M.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html