Re: GIT vs Other: Need argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Guilhem Bonnefille wrote:
> I'm new to Git, but completly crazy of it.
>
> In my point of view, in corporate team, lot of people does not
> want/need the power offered by Git.
> So, my conclusion is the better model in a corporate is a centralyzed
> repo with some users using Git as "frontend". Other people will simply
> use the native tools for accessing the repo.
>
> I didn't try Git with CVS repo but seems less usable in day to day
> work than a SVN repo with git-svn FANTASTIC tool.
>
> So the problem is simply now: how to convince people to migrate from
> CVS to SVN. This will be really less difficult as CVS and SVN are
> quite similar.
>   

Once git-svnserver is available, it should be possible to work the other
way, too - use git as the repository format and support Subversion users
through a subversion interface flavour.  Then you don't lose the merge
tracking and fast checkout performance for those who can use the native
protocol.

Sam.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]