Kirill Smelkov <kirr@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Another question: I'm preparing another version of "pack-objects: Teach > --use-bitmap-index codepath to respect --local ..." and was going to > put > > ( updated patch is in the end of this mail ) > > in the top of the message. Is it ok or better not to do so and just respin > the patch in its own separate mail? That would force those who pick leftover bits to _open_ and read a first few lines. Definitely it is better than burying a patch after 60+ lines, but a separate patch with incremented "[PATCH v6 1/2]" on the subject line beats it hands-down from discoverability's point of view. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html