Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add keyword unexpansion support to convert.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Glancing at the Gentoo bugs I've dealt with over the last 2 months as a
> quick survey, there are a few levels: 
> A - Able to submit a good diff
> B - Able to do a good implementation
> C - Able to come up with a good idea for improvement
>
> B are in short supply, and even of those, the number that can do A are
> smaller :-(. Category C is vastly bigger than B, and those that don't
> make B throw up a lot of chaff of bad implementations.
>
> Being able to extract the good ideas is what's important.

True, to a certain degree.  Maybe you and your fellow Gentoo
people are very much more accomodating, but my fear is that a
maintainer that goes length to sift through chaff himself
quickly runs out of time, becomes exhausted, and ends up being
careless.

Maybe I am spoiled by having only the best people around me, and
on git list.

But we are straying to a tangent.

I do not have much against an optional "only blob id" expansion
myself, as I do not see any more downside than CRLF expansion in
it.  But I suspect that once people see the $id$ expanded to
blob, they would not stop, because simply they do not understand
why blob-id and CRLF are much less evil than other things.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]