Re: [PATCH 2/2] nedmalloc: work around overzealous GCC 6 warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio & René,

On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Let's try it this way.  How about this as a replacement?

I like it (with the if (s2) test intead of if (s1), of course). But please
record René as author, maybe mentioning myself with a "Diagnosed-by:"
line.

FWIW today's `pu` does pass the test suite without problems in my CI
setup.

This setup will from now on test next & pu in the Git for Windows SDK, and
rebase Git for Windows' current master to git.git's maint, master, next &
pu, every morning after a weekday (unless I forget to turn on my laptop,
that is).

Once it stabilizes, I will figure out a way how to publish the logs,
because playing Lt Tawney Madison gets old real quick.

Thanks,
Dscho

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]