Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:08:48AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > However, I could imagine that we actually want this to be more extensible. >> > After all, all you are doing is to introduce a new rebase -i command that >> > does nothing else than shelling out to a command. >> >> Yup, I tend to agree. >> >> Adding "sign" feature (i.e. make it pass -S to "commit [--amend]") >> may be a good thing, but adding "sign" command to do so is not a >> great design. > > I'm not sure what you mean by "feature" here, but it reminded me of > Michael's proposal to allow options to todo lines: > > http://public-inbox.org/git/530DA00E.4090402@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > which would allow: > > pick -S 1234abcd > > If that's what you meant, I think it is a good idea. :) Yes, by "feature" I meant "giving the ability to decide if the resulting commit gets signature", which can and should be orthogonal to the choice of using editor to reword the message when the commit is created or "--no-edit" is passed and the original message is used verbatim. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html