On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:40:55PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > I'd welcome any feedback, whether on the interface and workflow, the > internals and collaboration, ideas on presenting diffs of patch series, > or anything else. > One other nice thing I've noticed about this tool is the way series behave like regular git branches: I specify the name of the series and from then on all other commands act on that series until told otherwise. git-appraise looks as though it might also have this behaviour. I think it's a nice way to do it, since you don't generally perform more than one review simultaneously. So I may well use this idea in git-candidate if it's okay. :) I haven't found time to use the tool to do any serious review yet, but I'll try and post some more feedback when I do. Hope this helps, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html