Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] status: V2 porcelain status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Any word when it will be included in `pu`, at least?
> 
> I've been waiting to see that the amount and quality of
> comments from others indicate that the series passed
> the phase that goes through frequent rerolls. Having a
> serious review in the thread that demonstrates and
> concludes that it is well designed, well implemented,
> and ready to go would help, of course.

Oh, I thought I had stated clearly already that what with Jeff being my
colleague and working on a feature I have a lot of interest in, I had
reviewed this patch series even before it was submitted to the Git mailing
list.

I would have been fine with the first iteration. And I had nothing to add
to the subsequent iterations, they are just as fine for me. I think the
patch series is ready to go.

The prospect of accelerating the Git prompt is also enticing.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]