Hi Junio, On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > ... my Git garden shears [*1*] (essentially, what > > git rebase --interactive --preserve-merges *should* have been). > > Any plan to fold it into "git rebase -i" as a new (improved) mode of > operation, by the way? It was my plan to integrate it into the sequencer, once the rebase--helper landed in `master`. Little did I know how long it would take to get this done... My loose idea was to deprecate --preserve-merges after introducing a --recreate-branches, or some such. But enough of that. The rebase--helper needs to get here first. > > However, I could imagine that we actually want this to be more extensible. > > After all, all you are doing is to introduce a new rebase -i command that > > does nothing else than shelling out to a command. > > Yup, I tend to agree. Awesome! Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html