Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] run-command: add clean_on_exit_handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 02 Aug 2016, at 07:53, Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Am 01.08.2016 um 13:14 schrieb Lars Schneider:
> >> On 30 Jul 2016, at 11:50, Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Am 30.07.2016 um 01:37 schrieb larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx:
> >>> static struct child_to_clean *children_to_clean;
> >>> @@ -30,6 +31,8 @@ static void cleanup_children(int sig, int in_signal)
> >>> {
> >>> 	while (children_to_clean) {
> >>> 		struct child_to_clean *p = children_to_clean;
> >>> +		if (p->clean_on_exit_handler)
> >>> +			p->clean_on_exit_handler(p->pid);
> >>
> >> This summons demons. cleanup_children() is invoked from a signal
> >> handler. In this case, it can call only async-signal-safe functions.
> >> It does not look like the handler that you are going to install
> >> later will take note of this caveat!
> >>
> >>> 		children_to_clean = p->next;
> >>> 		kill(p->pid, sig);
> >>> 		if (!in_signal)
> >>
> >> The condition that we see here in the context protects free(p)
> >> (which is not async-signal-safe). Perhaps the invocation of the new
> >> callback should be skipped in the same manner when this is called
> >> from a signal handler? 507d7804 (pager: don't use unsafe functions
> >> in signal handlers) may be worth a look.
> >
> > Thanks a lot of pointing this out to me!
> >
> > Do I get it right that after the signal "SIGTERM" I can do a cleanup
> > and don't need to worry about any function calls but if I get any
> > other signal then I can only perform async-signal-safe calls?
> 
> No. SIGTERM is not special.
> 
> Perhaps you were misled by the SIGTERM mentioned in cleanup_children_on_exit()? This function is invoked on regular exit (not from a signal). SIGTERM is used in this case to terminate children that are still lingering around.

Yes, that was my source of confusion. Thanks for the clarification!

> 
> > If this is correct, then the following solution would work great:
> >
> > 		if (!in_signal && p->clean_on_exit_handler)
> > 			p->clean_on_exit_handler(p->pid);
> 
> This should work nevertheless because in_signal is set when the function is invoked from a signal handler (of any signal that is caught) via cleanup_children_on_signal().

Right. Thank you!

- Lars--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]