Re: [PATCH v9 33/41] environment: add set_index_file()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> In cache.h we have a NO_THE_INDEX_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS,
>> and lots of
>>   #define foo_bar(..) frob_bar(&the_index, (..))
>>
>> Could you operate on the raw functions that take pointers to &the_index
>> and point these to a temporary index?
>
> Isn't mention of the_index is a red-herring?
>
> The in-core index_state does not even know what file it needs to be
> written to, so whether you explicitly specify your own index or use
> the compat macros to access the_index, you would need to specify to
> which file you would write it out or from which file you would read
> the new contents.

Having said that, I agree with you that the cop-out "Yes we know
this is bad" needs a lot more clarification, pointing out what issue
this side-steps and a direction to solve it correctly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]