Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Dakota Hawkins <dakotahawkins@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> In those cases specifically, I never have local commits that differ >> from the remote, so a "pull --ff-only" should leave me in the same >> state as a "pull --rebase". >> >> Is this a case of rebase trying to make sure it has enough information >> for me to be a committer before knowing whether I even need to rewrite >> any commits, and could/should that be avoided? Alternatively (or also) >> could/should rebase detect that a fast-forward is possible and prefer >> to do that instead? > > I think that is a reasonable argument,... There is one that still wants to know who you are, I think. The reflog entries record who moved the tip of the ref and when, and obviously a fast-forward is also recorded. I _think_ our intention was to allow a bogus ident in reflog entries (even though we want to avoid a bogus ident in commits and tags), so perhaps additional code/logic for user.useConfigOnly may need to know about that (I didn't dig)? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html