Re: [PATCH] pretty format string support for reflog times

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 04:14:14AM -0400, Phil Pennock wrote:
>
>> The reflog contains timestamp information, but these were not exposed to
>> `--pretty`.  Four of the six author/committer format string
>> second-letters were still available and copied, but `d`/`D` are taken
>> for reflog selector formatting.  So use `%gT` for "time" instead of
>> "date" mnemonic for using `--date=...` formatting.
>
> Hrm. Since Ted was not cc'd, it is not clear to me whether this is
> coincidental or in response to the thread over in
>
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/299201
>
> To summarize, I think the conclusion there was that we would go with at
> least the 't' and 'r' formatters in the short term. The 'i/I' ones were
> not something Ted cared about that much, I think, but they do make
> things orthogonal with the other ident dates.

I forgot about that thread after it stalled without drawing
conclusion, after Ted asked if anybody has a strong opinion
and saw only one response to it at

  https://public-inbox.org/git/20160711164317.GB3890%40thunk.org/

So, what is the next step?  Apply

  https://public-inbox.org/git/20160710055402.32684-1-tytso%40mit.edu/

but exclude %g[iI] bits out of that patch while doing so?

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]