Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 04:14:14AM -0400, Phil Pennock wrote: > >> The reflog contains timestamp information, but these were not exposed to >> `--pretty`. Four of the six author/committer format string >> second-letters were still available and copied, but `d`/`D` are taken >> for reflog selector formatting. So use `%gT` for "time" instead of >> "date" mnemonic for using `--date=...` formatting. > > Hrm. Since Ted was not cc'd, it is not clear to me whether this is > coincidental or in response to the thread over in > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/299201 > > To summarize, I think the conclusion there was that we would go with at > least the 't' and 'r' formatters in the short term. The 'i/I' ones were > not something Ted cared about that much, I think, but they do make > things orthogonal with the other ident dates. I forgot about that thread after it stalled without drawing conclusion, after Ted asked if anybody has a strong opinion and saw only one response to it at https://public-inbox.org/git/20160711164317.GB3890%40thunk.org/ So, what is the next step? Apply https://public-inbox.org/git/20160710055402.32684-1-tytso%40mit.edu/ but exclude %g[iI] bits out of that patch while doing so? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html