I assume that feature branches are not frequently enough merged into master. Because of that we discover bugs later than we could with a more continuous code integration. I don't want to discuss here whether feature branches are good or bad. I want just to ask is there a way how to generate a statistic for the average duration of feature branches until they are merged to the master? I would like to know if it is 1 day, 2 days or lets say 8 or 17 days. Also it would be interesting to see the statistical outliers. I hope my motivation became clear and what kind of git repository data I would like to produce. Any ideas? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html