Re: [PATCH v2] fetch-pack: grow stateless RPC windows exponentially

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When updating large repositories, the LARGE_FLUSH limit (that is, the
> limit at which the window growth strategy switches from exponential to
> linear) is reached quite quickly. Use a conservative exponential growth
> strategy when that limit is reached instead (and increase LARGE_FLUSH so
> that there is no regression in window size).

Care to elaborate on why you choose 11/10 as growth factor?

(As someone who has a tick in micro optimizing:
9/8 is roughly the same exponent, but the division
by 8 is easier as it is just a shift by 3. Similar 17/16)

I guess one design criterion was 10 being a round number?
Does it make sense to experiment with the factor at all?
Digging into that, LARGE_FLUSH originates from 6afca450c3f,
(2011-03-20, fetch-pack: progressively use larger handshake windows),
and before we only had a linear growth.

So I guess what I do not understand is why we need to slow down the
exponential growth at all?

Thanks,
Stefan



>
> This optimization is only applied during stateless RPCs to avoid the
> issue raised and fixed in commit
> 44d8dc54e73e8010c4bdf57a422fc8d5ce709029.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fetch-pack.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fetch-pack.c b/fetch-pack.c
> index b501d5c..85e77af 100644
> --- a/fetch-pack.c
> +++ b/fetch-pack.c
> @@ -243,16 +243,21 @@ static void insert_one_alternate_ref(const struct ref *ref, void *unused)
>
>  #define INITIAL_FLUSH 16
>  #define PIPESAFE_FLUSH 32
> -#define LARGE_FLUSH 1024
> +#define LARGE_FLUSH 16384
>
>  static int next_flush(struct fetch_pack_args *args, int count)
>  {
> -       int flush_limit = args->stateless_rpc ? LARGE_FLUSH : PIPESAFE_FLUSH;
> -
> -       if (count < flush_limit)
> -               count <<= 1;
> -       else
> -               count += flush_limit;
> +       if (args->stateless_rpc) {
> +               if (count < LARGE_FLUSH)
> +                       count <<= 1;
> +               else
> +                       count = count * 11 / 10;
> +       } else {
> +               if (count < PIPESAFE_FLUSH)
> +                       count <<= 1;
> +               else
> +                       count += PIPESAFE_FLUSH;
> +       }
>         return count;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]